English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper analyzes the potential of using measures of social function as health indicators in dental research. It discusses existing methodologies and presents findings from a cross-section of studies that adopt a social function perspective in the investigation of oral health status. While the literature in this area is small, much of the research concerns disability days associated with dental problems. The United States National Health Interview Survey reported in 1981 that 4.87 million dental conditions caused 17.7 million days of restricted activity, 6.73 million days of bed disability, and 7.05 million days of work loss. Other reports suggest that these data may be underestimates due to the National Health Survey's definition of disability days. Several other studies have found work loss to affect from 15 per cent to 33 per cent of samples studied resulting in many more work loss days than reported by the National Health Survey. Our study concludes that traditional measures of oral health status--such as decayed, missing, and filled teeth and the periodontal index--should be linked to measures of social outcome in order to place dental conditions within the broader context of health status in terms that are relevant to policy makers.

Dental health and public policy: the social impact of dental disease.