Considerations for Incorporating “Well-Being” in Public Policy for Workers and Workplaces
Author(s) -
Paul A. Schulte,
Rebecca J. Guerin,
Anita Schill,
Anasua Bhattacharya,
Thomas R. Cunningham,
Sudha P. Pandalai,
Donald E. Eggerth,
Carol M. Stephenson
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
american journal of public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.284
H-Index - 264
eISSN - 1541-0048
pISSN - 0090-0036
DOI - 10.2105/ajph.2015.302616
Subject(s) - operationalization , flourishing , workforce , scope (computer science) , well being , realm , public relations , public health , public policy , occupational safety and health , productivity , work (physics) , political science , sociology , psychology , medicine , nursing , economic growth , social psychology , economics , law , computer science , engineering , mechanical engineering , philosophy , epistemology , programming language
Action to address workforce functioning and productivity requires a broader approach than the traditional scope of occupational safety and health. Focus on "well-being" may be one way to develop a more encompassing objective. Well-being is widely cited in public policy pronouncements, but often as ". . . and well-being" (e.g., health and well-being). It is generally not defined in policy and rarely operationalized for functional use. Many definitions of well-being exist in the occupational realm. Generally, it is a synonym for health and a summative term to describe a flourishing worker who benefits from a safe, supportive workplace, engages in satisfying work, and enjoys a fulfilling work life. We identified issues for considering well-being in public policy related to workers and the workplace.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom