English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Scholars have struggled to come to grips with the era of Alexander I (1801–1825), who has generally been considered an ambivalent and indecisive monarch. Consequently, it has been much harder to politically define tsarist Russia than the eras of rulers who preceded him and who are either known as ‘great’ rulers or hold sobriquets explaining their strengths or shortcomings. As a result, Alexander’s rule remains a much-debated period in Russian history. This article asks the question whether a more coherent narrative concerning Alexander’s reign is possible when approaching tsarist Russia from interdisciplinary perspective, including studies in the fields of cultural, economic, political, and social history published in English, German, and Russian.

Ein Narrativ für die Zeit Alexanders I. in Russland? Zur Frage der Charakterisierung einer ambivalenten Herrschaftsperiode