z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The limits of complex partial nephrectomy: are there any?
Author(s) -
Vignesh T. Packiam,
R. Houston Thompson
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
annals of translational medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2305-5847
pISSN - 2305-5839
DOI - 10.21037/atm.2019.09.97
Subject(s) - nephrectomy , perioperative , medicine , urology , renal tumor , stage (stratigraphy) , surgery , kidney , paleontology , biology
We read with great interest the recent publication by Beksac et al . that explored outcomes following robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for anatomically complex, defined as R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score ≥10, cT1-cT2 renal masses (1). The authors aimed to determine the relationship between baseline clinicopathologic characteristics with “trifecta” achievement, defined as warm ischemia time <25 minutes, lack of perioperative complications, and negative surgical margins (1). Using a multi-institutional dataset, they found that the trifecta was achieved in 62% of patients and that no preoperative baseline, clinical, or tumor characteristics were associated with trifecta achievement. Interestingly, only pathologic tumor stage was significantly associated with achievement of trifecta. This manuscript contributes to the still developing literature for the important topic regarding the role of partial nephrectomy for large and complex renal masses.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom