Improving the methods for patient-reported experience measures in palliative care: findings from a cognitive interview study | Zendy

Tim Luckett | Zendy; Claudia Virdun | Zendy; Angela Rao | Zendy; L Daly | Zendy; Nadine Hackl | Zendy; Alexander Willems | Zendy; Jane Phillips | Zendy

Open Access

Improving the methods for patient-reported experience measures in palliative care: findings from a cognitive interview study

Author(s) -

Tim Luckett,

Claudia Virdun,

Angela Rao,

L Daly,

Nadine Hackl,

Alexander Willems,

Jane Phillips

Publication year - 2022

Publication title -

annals of palliative medicine

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.546

H-Index - 19

eISSN - 2224-5839

pISSN - 2224-5820

DOI - 10.21037/apm-22-9

Subject(s) - palliative care , medicine , advance care planning , cognition , think aloud protocol , recall , population , judgement , health care , nursing , comprehension , qualitative research , psychology , psychiatry , social science , linguistics , philosophy , environmental health , usability , human–computer interaction , sociology , computer science , political science , law , economics , cognitive psychology , economic growth

Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are questionnaires that ask patients about their experience of healthcare to inform service improvements. It is unclear how palliative care patients manage the cognitive demands of completing PREMs, or how this can best be supported. This study aimed to explore cognitive operations among people with palliative care needs when completing a PREM focused on the care domains known to be important to this patient population in order to inform future administration of questionnaires for this purpose.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research