Perspectives of research ethics committee members on human challenge studies in the development of vaccines against COVID-19: a mixed methods study | Zendy

Zihan Pan | Zendy; Hongling Chu | Zendy; Yu Zhang | Zendy; Xue Hong | Zendy; Lijun Liang | Zendy; Wenzhi Zhao | Zendy; Yahong Chen | Zendy; Chunli Song | Zendy

Open Access

Perspectives of research ethics committee members on human challenge studies in the development of vaccines against COVID-19: a mixed methods study

Author(s) -

Zihan Pan,

Hongling Chu,

Yu Zhang,

Xue Hong,

Lijun Liang,

Wenzhi Zhao,

Yahong Chen,

Chunli Song

Publication year - 2021

Publication title -

annals of palliative medicine

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.546

H-Index - 19

eISSN - 2224-5839

pISSN - 2224-5820

DOI - 10.21037/apm-20-2622

Subject(s) - medicine , thematic analysis , informed consent , representativeness heuristic , research ethics , declaration of helsinki , qualitative research , bioethics , family medicine , medical education , alternative medicine , psychology , pathology , social psychology , psychiatry , social science , sociology , biology , genetics

Vaccines are considered the most effective protection against the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Human Challenge Studies can help to shorten the development process of vaccines. The reviewers' opinions from research ethics committees (REC) play an essential gate-keeping role in determining whether a clinical trial can be conducted or not.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research