z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Is Gradient Descent Update Consistent with Accuracy-Based Learning Classifier System?
Author(s) -
Atsushi Wada,
Keiki Takadama
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of advanced computational intelligence and intelligent informatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.172
H-Index - 20
eISSN - 1343-0130
pISSN - 1883-8014
DOI - 10.20965/jaciii.2009.p0640
Subject(s) - reinforcement learning , computer science , gradient descent , learning classifier system , classifier (uml) , artificial intelligence , benchmark (surveying) , machine learning , residual , pattern recognition (psychology) , algorithm , artificial neural network , geodesy , geography
Learning Classifier Systems (LCSs) are rule-based adaptive systems that have both Reinforcement Learning (RL) and rule-discovery mechanisms for effective and practical online learning. An analysis of the reinforcement process of XCS, one of the currently mainstream LCSs, is performed from the aspect of RL. Upon comparing XCS's update method with gradient-descent-based parameter update in RL, differences are found in the following elements: (1) residual term, (2) gradient term, and (3) payoff definition. All possible combinations of the variants in each element are implemented and tested on multi-step benchmark problems. This revealed that few specific combinations work effectively with XCS's accuracy-based rule-discovery process, while pure gradient-descent-based update showed the worst performance.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom