English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Biological sciences have become the frontiers of new discoveries, major tools of solving local and global problems and creators of new employments. The high rate of new discoveries in biological sciences; new advances in cognitive sciences, learning research, computing and informatics; enhanced fusion of biological sciences and other natural sciences; and the requirement of the learners of the digital generation have presented a multitude of challenges to biology teaching and learning. In meeting the challenges and making biology education more effective, the vanguards of biology educations in the United States, namely the National Science Foundation (NSF), the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), Howard Hughes Medical Institutes (HHMI) and the national Institute of Health (NIH) have organized a series of regional meetings during 2006-2007 and a national conference titled Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education in 2009. The recommendations made by the experts participating in the meetings are summarized in the 2011 Final Report. The Report analysed the challenges quite comprehensively and made many recommendations on the changes needed in new biology education. However, the report placed the responsibilities of changing biology education largely to the biology educators. The present article is a reflection on the Report by a biology educator affiliated with an open enrolment large undergraduate university. The reflection indicates that structural changes though increased human and financial investment and a more concerted effort of the biology educators of high schools and colleges, education administrators, lawmakers, and community organizers are needed for an effective change in undergraduate biology education sought in the report

Who Should Change Biology Education: An Analysis of the Final Report on the Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education Conference