English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Objective: Working environments include many factors that affect the workers’ health, their social and cultural situations. Quality of life is an important outcome measure for evaluation of health conditions. This study determines the risk factors of workers in small-scale work places in an industrial site and evaluates their relationship with quality of life. Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed at an industrial site which includes 500 small scale work places. 125 work places were selected by randomized sampling and all workers (n=298) in these work places were asked to completed a questionnaire. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale (Turkish Version) (WHOQOL-BREF-TR) was used to measure the quality of life. For analysis, descriptive statistics, Mann Whitney U, independent t test, variance analyses, Pearson’s correlation and linear regression were used. Results: The mean age of the study group was 34.8±10.9 and 94.6% of the subjects were male. Physical, psychological, social, environmental and national environmental domain scores (mean±standart deviation) were found as 15.5±2.4, 14.7±2.5, 15.3±3.0, 13.8±2.5 and 14.9±4.3 respectively. In the working environment, the most common risks were (respectively) psychosocial (96.3%), ergonomic (67.1%), chemical (32.9%), physical (32.2%) and biological risks (28.5%). Physical, psychological, and national environmental domain scores of workers who were exposed at least one risk were found to be lower than others. Conclusion: Sex, perception of own economic potential and the working environment were risks with significant relevance for the quality of life. The study concluded that the working environment in particular includes risks that were the most important factor on physical and psychological domains.

Bir sanayi sitesinde küçük ölçekli işyerlerindeki risk faktörleri ve yaşam kalitesi ile ilişkisi