z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Prosody as a recursive embedding tool in production and perception of karajá
Author(s) -
Juliaovo Gomes,
Aniela Improta França,
Marcus Maia,
Albert Rilliard
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of speech sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2236-9740
DOI - 10.20396/joss.v5i2.15069
Subject(s) - prosody , recursion (computer science) , computer science , linguistics , stress (linguistics) , perception , psychology , cognitive science , speech recognition , programming language , philosophy , neuroscience
Hierarchical or indirect recursion can be found in different domains of human language and thus, it has been claimed to be the only part of language that is specific to humans (Hauser, Chomsky, and Fitch 2002). However, in the past decade, both the claims that, recursion is the central component of the “narrow faculty of language” and that, it should be present in all languages have been the object of intense debate (cf. Pinker & Jackendoff, 2005; Everett, 2005). This debate triggered the exploration of new frontiers in the examination of embedded structures, which have been examined in acquisition and in processing and have been shown to be implemented through a wide array of linguistic resources in different languages. This paper presents an acoustic description and a neuro-psycholinguistic analysis (ERP/EEG) of an uncommon cognitive device to embed relative clauses. It is implemented in Karaja, a Macro-Je language spoken in Central Brazil, which uses stress shift in relativization: (i) [tori do’rode] ‘the white man arrived’ versus (ii) [tori doro’de] ‘the white man who arrived’, as first described in Ribeiro (2006). The major interest in studying this phenomenon is because in Karaja, more than structuring envelopes for acts of speech, prosody codes directly onto the central syntactic algorithm of recursion. We found evidence in favor of a stronger facilitation to process a coordinated structure than a recursive structure. We found smaller RTs and amplitudes in the EEG related to the coordinated conditions versus the embedding conditions. Also, it seems that even though embedding is harder to launch, hierarchical structuring makes it easier to process in the third embedding, when comprehenders learn they are in an embedding mode. Coordination, on the other hand, being a default, is easier to launch, but it seems to become progressively harder as it does not benefit from hierarchical structuring.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom