English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Until recently, Roma people in Turkey and their political demands have been largely neglected. This group of people did not have any political representation through which to raise their voices or any kind of political will to change the discriminative clauses in Turkish legislations. However, since the accession negotiation process to the EU started, there has been a limited but important awakening in the consideration of Roma people in Turkey. In this regard, the most important step was the election of the first ever Roma MP in the history of the Turkish Republic. However, it is still possible to see limited political participation by the Roma in Turkey. Based on interview data in a qualitative framework, this paper will question the background of the limited political participation of Roma people. The interviews are conducted in one of the Turkish cities which is populated by a significant number of Roma: Edirne. This paper will address the hindrances to their active political participation, the sources of these hindrances and how Roma people have perceived recent developments. Drawing on the literature on political participation by minority groups, this study argues that although there has been visible political engagement by Roma groups, two important barriers affect their active participation. The joint effects of discriminative attitudes and internal dividedness weaken the Roma people’s power to influence politics. All in all, participation by Roma people remains limited and is symbolic rather than being influential and active. Oz: Cok yakin bir zamana kadar, Turkiye’de yasayan Romanlarin istekleri buyuk olcude gormezden gelinmekteydi. Turkiye’de Roman gruplar seslerini yukseltebilecekleri bir partiye ya da mevzuatta yer alan ayrimci ifadeleri kaldiracak siyasi iradeye sahip degillerdi. Ancak, AB muzakere surecinin baslamasi ile beraber bu alanda onemli bir uyanis yasandi. Konuyla ilgili en buyuk gelisme ise Turkiye Cumhuriyeti tarihinde ilk defa bir Roman milletvekilinin meclise secilmesi oldu. Ancak, hala Turkiye’de kisitli bir Roman siyasi katilimi soz konusudur. Niteliksel analizi yapilan mulakat verilerine dayanan bu calisma, Romanlarin kisitli siyasi katiliminin arka planini incelemektedir. Mulakatlar Roman nufusunun yogun oldugu Edirne ilinde gerceklesmistir. Calisma, siyasi katilim onundeki engelleri, bu engellerin kaynaklarini ve alandaki guncel gelismelerin Romanlarca nasil algilandigini incelemektedir. Azinlik gruplarin siyasi katilimlari alan yazinina dayanan bu calismada, Romanlarin siyasi katilimlarinda gozle gorunur artis yasanmasina ragmen, iki buyuk engelin katilimi etkiledigi iddia edilmektedir. Romanlarin hem maruz kaldiklari ayrimcilik ve hem de grup ici bolunmusluk Roman gruplarinin siyaseti etkileme guclerini azaltmaktadir. Sonuc olarak Roman siyasi katilimi etkili ve aktif olmaktan cok kisitli ve sembolik kalmaktadir.

humanitas uluslararası sosyal bilimler dergisi/humanitas international journal of social sciences

ACTIVE OR TOKEN PARTICIPATION?: HOPES AND HINDERANCES BEFORE ROMA FACE POLITICAL AMBITIONS (AKTİF YA DA SEMBOLİK KATILIM?: ROMANLARIN SİYASAL İSTEKLERİNE YÖNELİK UMUTLAR VE ENGELLER)