English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Oz: Michael Hardt ve Antonio Negri’nin Imparatorluk Tezi, yakin donemde kuresel dunya duzenini anlamak acisindan oldukca verimli bir yaklasim olarak karsimiza cikmaktadir. Emperyalizm kavraminin gecerliligini kaybettigini savunan yazarlar, -1970’lerden itibaren ortaya cikan- bir dizi toplumsal degisme unsurunu (Roma Imparatorlugu’na gonderme yaparak) Imparatorluk kavramsallastirmasi ile butunluklu bir bicimde ele alir. Hardt ve Negri, kuresellesmis dunyanin savas eksenli bir egemenlik paradigmasi ile yonetilmekte oldugunu ve kuresellesmenin etkisiyle ortaya cikan ulus-ustu yonetim organlarinin yeni bir tur hak ve adalet nosyonu sayesinde savaslari haklilastirdigini ileri surmektedir. Bu baglamda hakli savas kavrami, kuresel politika alaninda yeniden canlanmistir. Geleneksel anlami ile savaslari Batili Hristiyan dunyasi icin metafizik baglamda haklilastiran hakli savas kavrami, post-modern cagda Imparatorluk aygitinin kuresel askeri mudahalelerini evrensel degerler -baris ve adalet- adina haklilastirir hale gelmistir. Yazarlarin bu iddiasi, sosyolojik anlamda kuresellesmenin seyrine iliskin yeni bir yorum olarak ele alinabilmektedir. Bu anlamda Hardt ve Negri, asiri kuresellesmeci yazarlar olarak karsimiza cikmaktadir; ancak kuresellesmenin politik boyutunda hakli savas kavrami ile olumsuz bir goruntu sunmaktadir. Bu iddia, ayni zamanda Avrupa’da baris soylemlerinin buyuk bir artis gostermesine karsin, yine Avrupa’nin kuresel ve yerel catismalara olan surekli ilgisini bir bakima anlamli hale getirmektedir. Bu calismada yapilacak olan ise, Hardt ve Negri’nin bir iktidar paradigmasi baglaminda ele aldigi hakli savas kavraminin, kuresellesmenin politik boyutunda kazandigi onemi, sosyolojik kavramlar etrafinda tartismaktir. Abstract: Michael Hardt’s and Antonio Negri’s Empire thesis appears to be a very productive approach to understand the recent global world order. Asserting that the term imperialism has lost its validity, the writers discuss systematically a number of social changes - that have occurred since the 1970s - by using the Empire contextualization (referring to the Roman Empire). Hardt and Negri claim that the globalized world is being ruled by a war-based sovereignty paradigm and supranational ruling organizations which emerged with globalization justify wars through a new kind of notion of right and justice. In this context, the term just war re-emerged in the sphere of global politics. In its traditional meaning, the just war concept meant to justify wars in metaphysical context for Christian World; but now it seems to justify the global military interventions of Empire apparatus in the name of universal values -peace and justice- in post-modern era. Sociologically, this claim of writers’ can be handled as a new explanation for the globalization process. This claim also makes sense about European continuous attention to the global and local conflicts despite the great increase of peace discourses in Europe. In the context of claim mentioned above, the aim of study is to discuss the importance of term just war in political dimension of globalization which Hardt and Negri reveal as part of a power paradigm.

humanitas uluslararası sosyal bilimler dergisi/humanitas international journal of social sciences

HAKLI SAVAŞ KAVRAMINA POST-MODERN BİR YAKLAŞIM OLARAK M. HARDT VE A. NEGRİ’NİN İMPARATORLUK TEZİ (HARDT’S AND NEGRI’S EMPIRE THESIS AS A POST-MODERN APPROACH TO JUST WAR CONCEPT)