English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper compares two different methods of a truss optimization. The goal of the optimization is to minimize the compliance of the truss like structures, maximizing the stiffness. The methods used are the Evolutionary Structural Optimization, which is based in slowly removing inefficient material of the structure1, and the Method of Moving Asymptotes, method developed by Kristen Svanberg, based in creating a strictly convex approximated subproblem2, which is solved in each iteration of the optimization process.

anais do congresso de iniciação científica da unicamp

Comparison and implementation of two methods in a truss optimization, one based in an evolutionary structural optimization, other based in mathematical programming