LA TUTORÍA GRUPAL COMO FACTOR DE IMPACTO EN LA EFICIENCIA TERMINAL
Author(s) -
Hugo Ireta López
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
hitos de ciencias económico administrativas
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2448-4733
pISSN - 1405-4574
DOI - 10.19136/hitos.a0n50.474
Subject(s) - tutor , factor (programming language) , terminal (telecommunication) , psychology , humanities , philosophy , computer science , mathematics education , programming language , telecommunications
RESUMEN Objetivo: Evidenciar y documentar la participacion, reflexion y objetividad de experimentacion del estudiante en un ejercicio previo que los oriente y motive para estructurar y defender su proyecto de tesis frente a un jurado de examen profesional. Material y metodo: El estudio presenta un enfoque cualitativo en cuanto busca a traves de la aplicacion de la tres guias metodologicas identificar como estas afectan la variables relacionadas con la disminucion del numero de tesis presentadas por los egresados del nivel licenciatura en la DACEA, definiendo su pertinencia y congruencia con los esfuerzos institucionales por elevar la participacion de los alumnos en proceso de investigacion. Se trabajo con observacion directa durante las jornadas de presentacion de protocolos y resultados preliminares de investigacion; y con entrevistas de salida a los docentes y estudiantes al concluir su participacion en el evento. Al ser este un ejercio libre y voluntario por parte de los alumnos y los maestro, se cuantifico como dato adicional el numero de participaciones por modalidad. Resultados: En las jornadas de presentacion de protocolos y resultados preliminares de investigacion, se revisaron 98 trabajos por 57 profesores, determinandose que de ellos 28 protocolos eran viables para ser trabajos recepcionales para titulacion via tesis y 39 avances de investigacion eran significativos y que podria ser investigaciones concluidas en periodos inferiores a tres meses. De los 11 protocolos que tenian observaciones mayores, los mismos profesores ofrecieron apoyo para su rediseno y reestructuracion. Conclusiones: En terminos generales estas jornadas de presentacion de protocolos y resultados de investigacion han resultado satisfactorias, pero aun se denotan deficiencias en el proceso de accion de asesoria, acompanamiento metodologico y tutorial debido principalmente a la falta de compromiso de los elementos participantes. ABSTRACT Objective: to make evident and provide records of the participation, reflection and experimental objectivity of the students in a previous exercise that leads and motivates them to structure and defend their thesis work project while facing the professional exam jury. Material and method: This document shows a qualitative approach since it looks through the use of the three methodological guidelines to identify how these can affect the variables related to the diminishing of theses presented by the graduates of the DACEA, by defining its persistency and congruence with the institutional effort to increase the participation of the students on this research process. The information was collected on a basis of direct observation during the days of submission of protocols and preliminary research results as well as in exit polls and interviews with teachers and students at the end of their participation in the event. Since this was a free and voluntary exercise by students and teachers, the number of participations by modality was quantified as an additional data. Results: In the days of submitting research protocols and research preliminary results, 98 papers were reviewed by 57 professors, determining that 28 of these documents were viable protocols for thesis to get the corresponding degree and 39 were significant advances in the research so that they could be completed in a period no longer than three months. From those 11 protocols that had major comments, the teachers themselves offered support to redesigning and restructuring of the documents. Conclusions: In general terms the days where the research protocols and results were submitted were successful, however, there are still deficiencies in the mentoring action process and methodological support, due mainly to the lack of compromise of those involved in the process.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom