z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Edward Chamberlin: Monopolistic Competition And Pareto Optimality
Author(s) -
Don Bellante
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of business and economics research (jber)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2157-8893
pISSN - 1542-4448
DOI - 10.19030/jber.v2i4.2871
Subject(s) - monopolistic competition , economics , imperfect competition , pareto principle , pareto optimal , competition (biology) , microeconomics , imperfect , perfect competition , point (geometry) , welfare , computer science , monopoly , biology , market economy , set (abstract data type) , operations management , ecology , linguistics , philosophy , geometry , mathematics , programming language
In treatments of Monopolistic Competition, Edward Chamberlin and Joan Robinson are usually credited with simultaneously and independently developing the theory of monopolistic or imperfect competition. While their contributions were indeed simultaneously developed, it is inappropriate to treat them as having duplicated each other’s efforts. Yet it has become customary in many treatments to regard them as having done just that, and modern textbook treatments tend to mention the two as if they were interchangeable. In no respect were they less so than in their views of the welfare implications of monopolistic competition. But the passage of time seems to have resulted in a blurring of the distinction between them, and it has become a common practice to ascribe to monopolistic competition an incompatibility with Pareto optimality. An important point of focus of this paper is Chamberlin’s response to the tendency to treat his analysis as indicating a market failure.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom