College Students’ Sense Of Cycling Capability Deters Helmet Use: Implications For Safety Helmet Ordinances
Author(s) -
Ronald E. Cossman,
Ronald D. Williams,
Barry Hunt,
Catherine Ali Fratesi,
Sarah Beth Slinkard,
Timothy Day
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
american journal of health sciences (ajhs)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2156-7794
pISSN - 2157-9636
DOI - 10.19030/ajhs.v4i2.7758
Subject(s) - cycling , occupational safety and health , crash , injury prevention , suicide prevention , poison control , human factors and ergonomics , perception , psychology , medicine , applied psychology , medical emergency , political science , law , computer science , archaeology , neuroscience , history , programming language
Proponents frequently cite increased injury protection as a reason for supporting bicycle helmet ordinances; yet, many cyclists oppose such policies. In this study, six focus groups of college students discussed cycling behaviors and attitudes toward using bicycle safety helmets, and perceptions of the local helmet ordinance. The usual concerns were voiced such as “ inconvenien ce” and “helmet hair”. Participants reported very high confidence in their cycling ability and their ability to avoid a crash which might require a helmet. They failed to take into account external factors or the actions of others which may increase risk for injury. They also did not understand how health insurance spreads the financial risk for traumatic events. These findings have implications for designing education campaigns to promote college student health, as well as initiatives for helmet ordinance advocacy.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom