z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Benefits of Rosuvastatin in Cardiovascular Protection Remain Unclear After HOPE-3
Author(s) -
YuHung Chang,
Der-Wei Hwu,
WeiPin Kao,
Yau-Jiunn Lee
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
the review of diabetic studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.701
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1614-0575
pISSN - 1613-6071
DOI - 10.1900/rds.2016.13.212
Subject(s) - rosuvastatin , atorvastatin , medicine , statin
he use of commercialized statins in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) has commonly been accepted based on the informative results of the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists (CTT) reports [1] As an additional effort in the prevention of CVD, professional societies have issued practical recommendations for healthcare providers on the effective use of statins in lowering low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) [2]. Among these statins, atorvastatin and rosuvastatin are regarded as the most effective as they can reduce more than 30% of LDL-C, even at low doses (i.e. atorvastatin 10 mg; rosuvastatin 5 mg) [2]. The results of the recent HOPE-3 study [3], in which 10 mg rosuvastatin was found to reduce the development of CVD by 24% in intermediate-risk persons, may reinforce the role of rosuvastatin in CVD prevention. However, there are some concerns regarding the use of rosuvastatin. Based on the CTT report [1] and our recent literature review [4], 6 atorvastatin and 4 rosuvastatin studies, characterized by their rigorous double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study designs, have been published in the past two decades. A meta-analysis using a random effect model showed that atorvastatin significantly reduced the risk of CVD, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.75-0.90, p <0.001, Figure 1). In contrast, the results of a meta-analysis including the 4 rosuvastatin trials failed to detect a significant reduction in CVD risk, with an OR of 0.86 (0.69-1.07, p = 0.163). Surprisingly, the effect of rosuvastatin in CVD risk prevention remained controversial, even after inclusion of the encouraging HOPE-3 study [3] in the analysis, which then yielded an overall OR of 0.84 (0.70-1.01, p = 0.063, Figure 1). While it is believed that CVD is significantly driven by LDL-C, and thereby the “class effect” of statins in lowering LDL-C has been viewed as essential in CVD prevention, the inconsistency in the atorvastatin and rosuvastatin results suggests that the “class effect” of statins in CVD protection R ep ri nt fr om T he R ev ie w o fD IA B E T IC S U D IE S V ol 13 N o 4 20 16

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom