z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Impact of contrast agents on dose algorıthms of planning systems
Author(s) -
Müzeyyen İzmirli,
Tahir Çakır,
S Avcu,
Maruf Nart
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
internatuinal journal of radiation research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2345-4229
pISSN - 2322-3243
DOI - 10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.14.1.25
Subject(s) - isocenter , contouring , nuclear medicine , contrast (vision) , linear particle accelerator , radiation treatment planning , volume (thermodynamics) , monitor unit , mathematics , biomedical engineering , materials science , optics , physics , beam (structure) , computer science , medicine , surgery , radiation therapy , imaging phantom , computer graphics (images) , quantum mechanics
Background: Use of contrast agents (CAs) during CT simula on for treatment planing system leads to changes in electron density. In this study we aimed to inves gate the effect on calculated dose of various concentra ons of CAs on treatment planing systems in different dose calcula on algorithms. Materials and Methods: Contrast agent (0.769 mg/ml Iopromid) water mixtures at concentra ons of 0%, 1%, 2%, 5% and 10% in total volume of 500 ml for each were made by using five iden cal balloons. Calcula ons were performed by Cobalt-60 and 10 MV linear accelerator devices in CMS XIO treatment planning system. The prescribed dose of 100cGy was given to the center of balloon that is isocenter of SAD technique at 10cm from the surface. The doses at maximum dose depth (dmax) and at 5 cm were calculated according to the separate algorithms by either making or not making a correc on for CA, and the results were recorded. Results: In all algorithms, as contrast ra o increases, the dose values at dmax and 5 cm-depth increase accordingly. When the doses at dmax and 5 cm-depth were compared for Linac and Co-60 in all algorithms, it has been shown that the dmax value of Co60 was higher and the difference was greater in parallel with increasing contrast ra o in comparing with Linac. Conclusion:When required during the planning, the treatment plan should be calculated via providing an electron density correc on by contouring the volume retaining CAs along the beam

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom