z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Commentary: De-implementation Science: A Virtuous Cycle of Ceasing and Desisting Low-Value Care Before Implementing New High Value Care
Author(s) -
Karina W. Davidson,
Siqin Ye,
George A. Mensah
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
ethnicity and disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.767
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1945-0826
pISSN - 1049-510X
DOI - 10.18865/ed.27.4.463
Subject(s) - virtuous circle and vicious circle , value (mathematics) , workload , psychological intervention , health care , patient care , medicine , psychology , nursing , economics , computer science , management , economic growth , machine learning , macroeconomics
Implementation science has traditionally focused on increasing the delivery of evidence-based care. The science of systematically stopping low-value and wasteful care is substantially under-recognized, and if successful, may decrease the workload of clinicians. De-implementation science identifies problem areas of low-value and wasteful practice, carries out rigorous scientific examination of the factors that initiate and maintain such behaviors, and then employs evidence-based interventions to cease these practices. In this commentary, we describe how this approach for de-implementation might require a different set of health systems supports, economic and non-economic levers, and behavior change techniques that can lead to a virtuous cycle, ie, a complex chain of events that positively reinforce themselves through a feedback loop of removing low-value care to make room for high quality care.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom