Rationale and Design of the Women and Inclusion in Academic Medicine Study | Zendy

Emorcia V. Hill | Zendy; Michael J. C. Wake | Zendy; René Carapinha | Zendy; SharonLise T. Normand | Zendy; Robert Wolf | Zendy; Keith C. Norris | Zendy; Joan Y. Reede | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Rationale and Design of the Women and Inclusion in Academic Medicine Study

Author(s) -

Emorcia V. Hill,

Michael J. C. Wake,

René Carapinha,

SharonLise T. Normand,

Robert Wolf,

Keith C. Norris,

Joan Y. Reede

Publication year - 2016

Publication title -

ethnicity and disease

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.767

H-Index - 67

eISSN - 1945-0826

pISSN - 1049-510X

DOI - 10.18865/ed.26.2.245

Subject(s) - inclusion (mineral) , focus group , qualitative property , academic medicine , grounded theory , sociocultural evolution , medical education , qualitative research , psychology , survey data collection , gerontology , medicine , sociology , social psychology , social science , statistics , mathematics , anthropology , computer science , machine learning

Women of color (WOC) (African American, Hispanic, Native American/Alaskan Native, and Asian American) faculty remain disproportionately underrepresented among medical school faculty and especially at senior ranks compared with White female faculty. The barriers or facilitators to the career advancement of WOC are poorly understood. The Women and Inclusion in Academic Medicine (WIAM) study was developed to characterize individual, institutional and sociocultural factors that influence the entry, progression and persistence, and advancement of women faculty in academic medical careers with a focus on WOC.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research