The Limitations of Global Social Movement Unionism as an Emancipatory Labour Strategy in Majority World Countries
Author(s) -
Zia Ur Rahman,
Tom Langford
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
socialist studies
Language(s) - French
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1918-2821
pISSN - 1717-2616
DOI - 10.18740/s44597
Subject(s) - democracy , political science , militant , collective action , colonialism , social movement , social dialogue , direct action , political economy , sociology , humanities , law , politics , philosophy
This study assesses the applicability of Peter Waterman’s model of global social movement unionism as an emancipatory labour strategy in Bangladesh, an important site for the manufacture of ready-made garments in the neo-liberal era. Our main conclusions are that Waterman’s North Atlanticist model fails to comprehend the present-day necessities and struggles of the Bangladesh working class; ignores the impacts of colonialism, militarism and imperialism on Bangladesh’s socio-economic development and labour movement; and privileges democratic dialogue as a means of action when militant collective mobilization has been shown to be the only effective way to get action on workers’ issues in countries like Bangladesh. Our recommendation is for Waterman and others to abandon the quest for a universal model of progressive labour unionism and instead come up with a variety of models that apply to different typical patterns of socio-economic and labour movement development in the globalized world. Cette etude evalue l’applicabilite du modele global de syndicalisme de mouvement social de Peter Waterman en tant que strategie liberatrice au Bangladesh, un site important pour la fabrication de textiles dans l’ere neoliberale. Nos conclusions principales sont que le modele nord-atlantiste de Waterman echoue a comprendre les besoins et souffrances de la classe ouvriere au Bangladesh aujourd’hui; qu’il ignore l’impact du colonialisme, du militarisme et de l’imperialisme sur le developpement socio-economique et sur le mouvement ouvrier ; et qu’il privilegie le dialogue democratique comme seul moyen d’agir alors que la mobilisation collective militante s’est montree comme la seule maniere efficace d’attirer l’attention sur les questions ouvrieres dans les pays comme le Bangladesh. Notre recommandation, pour Waterman et d’autres, est d’abandonner la quete d’un modele universel du syndicalisme progressiste et au lieu de cela de creer une variete de modeles qui s’appliquent aux differentes realites du developpement socio-economique et du mouvement ouvrier dans un monde globalise.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom