z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Advantages and Limitations of In Situ Methods of Bioremediation
Author(s) -
Jot Sharma
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
recent advances in biology and medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2378-654X
DOI - 10.18639/rabm.2019.955923
Subject(s) - bioremediation , environmental science , groundwater , contamination , environmental chemistry , microbial population biology , nutrient , in situ , biochemical engineering , environmental engineering , ecology , chemistry , biology , geology , bacteria , genetics , geotechnical engineering , organic chemistry , engineering
There are two major types of in situ bioremediation: intrinsic and enhanced. Both rely on natural processes to degrade contaminants with (enhanced) or without (intrinsic) amendments. In recent years, in situ bioremediation concepts have been applied in treating contaminated soil and groundwater. Removal rates and extent vary based on the contaminant of concern and site-specific characteristics. There are a number offactor/variables that affect the rate of removal such as contaminant and co-contaminant distribution as well as concentration; indigenous microbial populations and reaction kinetics; and parameters such as pH, moisture content, nutrient supply, and temperature. Many of these factors are a function of the site and the indigenous microbial community and, thus, are difficult to manipulate. Specific technologies may have the capacity to manipulate some variables and may be affected by other variables as well; these specific issues are discussed with each technology in the following sections.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom