Which Sensitivity Analysis Method Should I Use for My Agent-Based Model?
Author(s) -
Guus ten Broeke,
George van Voorn,
A. Ligtenberg
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of artificial societies and social simulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.768
H-Index - 59
ISSN - 1460-7425
DOI - 10.18564/jasss.2857
Subject(s) - sobol sequence , sensitivity (control systems) , computer science , point (geometry) , variance (accounting) , resource (disambiguation) , operations research , data mining , mathematics , engineering , computer network , geometry , accounting , business , electronic engineering
Existing methodologies of sensitivity analysis may be insufficient for a proper analysis of Agent-based Models (ABMs). Most ABMs consist of multiple levels, contain various nonlinear interactions, and display emergent behaviour. This limits the information content that follows from the classical sensitivity analysis methodologies that link model output to model input. In this paper we evaluate the performance of three well-known methodologies for sensitivity analysis. The three methodologies are extended OAT (one-at-a-time), and proportional assigning of output variance by means of model fitting and by means of Sobol’ decomposition. The methodologies are applied to a case study of limited complexity consisting of free-roaming and procreating agents that make harvest decisions with regard to a diffusing renewable resource. We find that each methodology has its own merits and exposes useful information, yet none of them provide a complete picture of model behaviour. We recommend extended OAT as the starting point for sensitivity analysis of an ABM, for its use in uncovering the mechanisms and patterns that the ABM produces.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom