Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing? | Zendy

Fernando Fernández-Llimós | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?

Author(s) -

Fernando Fernández-Llimós

Publication year - 2021

Publication title -

pharmacy practice

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.608

H-Index - 24

eISSN - 1886-3655

pISSN - 1885-642X

DOI - 10.18549/pharmpract.2021.1.2284

Subject(s) - publishing , nobody , quality (philosophy) , open peer review , visibility , work (physics) , peer review , computer science , public relations , world wide web , internet privacy , political science , law , engineering , computer security , epistemology , mechanical engineering , philosophy , botany , physics , optics , biology , plant biology

Scholarly publishing is in a crisis, with the many stakeholders complaining about different aspects of the system. Authors want fast publication times, high visibility and publications in high-impact journals. Readers want freely accessible, high-quality articles. Peer reviewers want recognition for the work they perform to ensure the quality of the published articles. However, authors, peer reviewers, and readers are three different roles played by the same group of individuals, the users of the scholarly publishing system—and this system could work based on a collaborative publishing principle where “nobody pays, and nobody gets paid”.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research