Comparison of conventional IVF versus ICSI in non-male factor, normoresponder patients | Zendy

Maryam Eftekhar | Zendy; Farnaz Mohammadian | Zendy; Fariba Yousefnejad | Zendy; Behnaz Molaei | Zendy; Abbas Aflatoonian | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Comparison of conventional IVF versus ICSI in non-male factor, normoresponder patients

Author(s) -

Maryam Eftekhar,

Farnaz Mohammadian,

Fariba Yousefnejad,

Behnaz Molaei,

Abbas Aflatoonian

Publication year - 2012

Publication title -

international journal of reproductive biomedicine (ijrm)

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

eISSN - 2476-4108

pISSN - 2476-3772

DOI - 10.18502/ijrm.v10i2.9056

Subject(s) - infertility , medicine , gynecology , male infertility , human fertilization , female infertility , obstetrics , pregnancy , biology , genetics , anatomy

Conventional IVF and ICSI are two common techniques to achievefertilization. IVF has long been used for treatment of infertility, although it is not aneffective treatment in severe male infertility. The use of ICSI has been expanded insevere male factor and fertilization failure after IVF cycle. In spite of the widespreaduse of ICSI in patients with non-male factor infertility, there is still little evidence toconfirm its effectiveness in this population

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research