z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Visualization of the Scholarly Output on Evidence Based Librarianship: A Social Network Analysis
Author(s) -
Nafiseh Vahed,
Vahideh Zarea Gavgani,
Rashid Jafarzadeh,
Ziba Tusi,
Mohammadamin Erfanmanesh
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
evidence based library and information practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.393
H-Index - 14
ISSN - 1715-720X
DOI - 10.18438/eblip29396
Subject(s) - social network analysis , scopus , centrality , social connectedness , scientometrics , library science , subject (documents) , bibliometrics , visualization , web of science , data science , social network (sociolinguistics) , descriptive statistics , webometrics , world wide web , computer science , medline , psychology , social media , political science , data mining , statistics , mathematics , law , psychotherapist
Objective – This paper aimed to analyze worldwide research on evidence based librarianship (EBL) using Social Network Analysis (SNA). Methods – This descriptive study has been conducted using scientometrics and a SNA approach. The researchers identified 523 publications on EBL, as indexed by Scopus and Web of Science with no date limitation. A range of software tools (Ravar PreMap, Netdraw, UCINet and VOSviewer) were utilized for data visualization and analysis. Results – Results of the study revealed that the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US) occupied the topmost positions regarding centrality measures, clearly indicating their important structural roles in EBL research. The network of EBL research in terms of the degree of connectedness showed low density in the co-authorship networks of both authors (0.013) and countries (0.214). Seven subject clusters were identified in the EBL research network, four of which related to health and medicine. The occurrence of the keywords related to these four subject clusters suggested that EBL research had a greater association with the setting of health and medicine than with traditional librarianship elements such as human resources or library collection management. Conclusion – This study provided a systematic understanding of topics, research, and researchers in EBL by visualizing the networks and may thus inform the development of future aspects of EBL research and education.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom