Cytotoxicity of PP(Arg)(2)- and Hp(Arg)(2)-mediated photodynamic therapy and early stage of apoptosis induction in prostate carcinoma in vitro.
Author(s) -
Agata Nowak-Stępniowska,
Katarzyna Wiktorska,
Maciej Małecki,
Anna Romiszewska,
Alfreda Padzik-Graczyk
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
acta biochimica polonica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.452
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1734-154X
pISSN - 0001-527X
DOI - 10.18388/abp.2011_2216
Subject(s) - photosensitizer , lncap , photodynamic therapy , depolarization , apoptosis , chemistry , mitochondrion , membrane potential , viability assay , cancer research , prostate , biophysics , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , medicine , biochemistry , photochemistry , cancer , organic chemistry
Porphyrin photosensitizers tend to localize in mitochondria. The depolarization of mitochondrial membrane is one of the early stages of apoptosis and Laser Scanning Fluorescence Microscopy allows to determine changes in transmembrane mitochondrial potential under influence of PDT depending on the kind of photosensitizer (PP(Arg)(2), Hp(Arg)(2)), the energy dose (5, 10, 30 and 50 J/cm(2)) and time periods (24 and 48 hours after irradiation) in the LNCaP (lymphonodal metastasis of prostate carcinoma, the androgen dependent cell line). Cyototoxicity induced by PP(Arg)(2)- and Hp(Arg)(2)-based PDT depending on energy dose and time after irradiation in prostate carcinoma is determined with MTT. Generally, it was shown that lower energy doses induce greater changes in transmembrane mitochondrial potential. Hp(Arg)(2)-based PDT was more effective causing greater mitochondrial membrane depolarization and cell viability decrease in comparison to PP(Arg)(2)-mediated PDT (in the case of maximal nontoxic photosensitizer doses used).
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom