English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Over the last 20 years, the Italian legislature has invested in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods with the aim of reducing the workload of the courts. Despite the progress of the ADR movement in Italy, it very soon became clear that ADR could not become a true alternative to traditional litigation: the parties and their lawyers still appear to prefer the court. This essay will initially provide an overview of the recent developments of ADR in Italy, especially mediation, as a means of problem-solving justice. This will be followed by an analysis of why the mediation process has failed and how mediation should be enhanced by judges (judicial conciliation). Then, the paper will conclude by attempting to synthesise the links between judicial mediation and the principle of therapeutic jurisprudence.

Problem-Solving Justice and Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Italian Legal Context