z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Supervision and supervisory authorities <br> A few introductory remarks
Author(s) -
Sacha Prechal,
H.F.M.W. van Rijswick
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
utrecht law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.216
H-Index - 14
ISSN - 1871-515X
DOI - 10.18352/ulr.14
Subject(s) - law , public law , political science , comparative law , private law , legal research , face (sociological concept) , philosophy of law , legal profession , politics , sociology , social science
University, the Netherlands. Both are members of the editorial board of the Utrecht Law Review (contact: A.Prechal@law.uu.nl; H.vanRijswick@law.uu.nl). 1 This is at least true for the Netherlands. See, however, also the next note. 2 Cf. R. Caranta , M. Andenas and D. Fairgrieve, Independent Administrative Authorities, British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2004; T. Zwart and L.Verhey, Agencies in European and Comparative Law, Antwerp/Oxford/New York 2003. As for liability, see for instance M Tison, ‘Do not attack the watchdog! Banking supervisor’s liability after Peter Paul’, 2005 Common Market Law Review, no. 42, pp. 639-675, and C. van Dam, Aansprakelijkheid van toezichthouders, WODC/BIICL 2006.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom