Funding the Judiciary: How Budgeting System Shapes Justice. A Comparative Analysis of Three Case Studies. | Zendy

Federica Viapiana | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Funding the Judiciary: How Budgeting System Shapes Justice. A Comparative Analysis of Three Case Studies.

Author(s) -

Federica Viapiana

Publication year - 2019

Publication title -

international journal for court administration

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.173

H-Index - 4

ISSN - 2156-7964

DOI - 10.18352/ijca.295

Subject(s) - accountability , independence (probability theory) , economic justice , judicial independence , accounting , political science , quality (philosophy) , judicial review , economics , public economics , public administration , law and economics , law , mathematics , statistics , epistemology , philosophy , politics

Based on three case studies (Finland, France and The Netherlands), this article describes the performance-based budgeting models in place in the judiciaries of the three countries, and their effects (positive and negative) on the courts’ functioning. This article represent a first attempt to analyse the impact of funding mechanisms on judicial independence, accountability, efficiency and quality.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research