User-Based Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems Approach in Industrial Engineering Curriculum Design and Review Process
Author(s) -
Ebisa Wollega,
Vitor Ambrosio Winckler
Publication year - 2016
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/p.27119
Subject(s) - curriculum , recommender system , computer science , process (computing) , relevance (law) , collaborative filtering , adaptation (eye) , variety (cybernetics) , engineering design process , engineering education , collaborative engineering , information engineering , industrial design , data science , work in process , engineering management , information system , world wide web , artificial intelligence , engineering , psychology , pedagogy , operations management , operating system , mechanical engineering , physics , electrical engineering , optics , political science , law
Industrial engineering curriculum is relatively very sensitive to changes in industry needs compared to other engineering disciplines because of its structure. The effectiveness of the curriculum design and review process depends on the variety and the volume of input data. Industrial engineering educators usually collect data from students, alumni, and industry stakeholders. With the availability of massive online data, mining relevant information and combining the information with the data collected from the traditional data sources would improve the efficacy of the industrial engineering curriculum design and review process. In this paper, we propose online job posting data as additional relevant information that can be integrated to the curriculum design and review process. We describe the adaptation of a userbased collaborative filtering recommender systems algorithm to analyze the online data and to convert the data into relevant information that can be used as input to the process. An undergraduate industrial engineering Operations Planning and Control course case study was used to illustrate the adaptation of the algorithm. Some of the topics taught in the course were searched on websites that advertise jobs and tallied. A professor who is familiar with the topics also provided expert judgments with regard to the relevance of the topics to industry needs. Both data sets were used as inputs to the algorithm. The experimental results show that some of the topics are highly correlated with the expert judgment than others; these topics would be given more emphasis than the less correlated topics during the curriculum design and review process. Analysis of new topics that did not receive expert judgments is also presented. The method proposed in this paper plays a great role in continuous curriculum review process as massive data sets can be extracted from online sources and processed within short time window. The industrial engineering educators can make use of more of the online data as input to curriculum design and review process to improve the efficiency of the process. This paper can also lead engineering educators to possibly explore the contribution of massive online data as an input to curriculum design and review process instead of simply relying on the traditional data sources.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom