z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Evaluating the Impacts of Different Interventions on Quality in Concept Generation
Author(s) -
Kevin Helm,
Kathryn Jablokow,
Shanna Daly,
Eli Silk,
Seda Yılmaz,
Rafael Suero
Publication year - 2016
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/p.26766
Subject(s) - psychological intervention , framing (construction) , ideation , engineering design process , computer science , management science , process management , risk analysis (engineering) , knowledge management , engineering , psychology , business , mechanical engineering , structural engineering , psychiatry , cognitive science
Producing ideas of high quality has great importance in engineering design. Although concept generation is sometimes one of the shorter phases of a project, concept generation that leads to viable and unique solutions can greatly contribute to a product’s final outcomes. Concept generation also has importance as a tool for engineering education and academic research. Because the quality of solutions can vary from individual to individual and from circumstance to circumstance, it would be useful to better understand how different interventions influence the outcomes of the ideation process in the concept generation stage of engineering design. In this work, we investigated the impacts of the problem context and three specific interventions designed to increase the ideation flexibility for the outcomes of concept generation. The three interventions were problem framing, design tools, and teaming. Our results show that both problem framing and teaming impact several aspects of quality, while design tools only impact the quantity of ideas produced.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom