Students' Use of Evidence-Based Reasoning in K-12 Engineering: A Case Study (Fundamental) | Zendy

Corey Mathis | Zendy; Emilie Siverling | Zendy; Aran Glancy | Zendy; S. Selcen Guzey | Zendy; Tamara J. Moore | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Students' Use of Evidence-Based Reasoning in K-12 Engineering: A Case Study (Fundamental)

Author(s) -

Corey Mathis,

Emilie Siverling,

Aran Glancy,

S. Selcen Guzey,

Tamara J. Moore

Publication year - 2016

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Conference proceedings

DOI - 10.18260/p.25943

Subject(s) - argumentation theory , curriculum , next generation science standards , engineering education , engineering design process , argument (complex analysis) , process (computing) , mathematics education , computer science , science education , engineering ethics , psychology , pedagogy , engineering , engineering management , chemistry , mechanical engineering , philosophy , biochemistry , epistemology , operating system

Aran Glancy is a Ph.D candidate in STEM education with an emphasis in Mathematics Education at the University of Minnesota. He has experience teaching both high school physics and mathematics, and his research focuses on supporting mathematics learning, specifically in the domains of data analysis and measurement, through STEM integration and engineering. He is also interested in mathematical modeling.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research