z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
How Can Maker Skills Fit in with Accreditation Demands for Undergraduate Engineering Programs?
Author(s) -
Aubrey Wigner,
Micah Lande,
Shawn Jordan
Publication year - 2016
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/p.25468
Subject(s) - accreditation , engineering education , mindset , process (computing) , engineering management , lifelong learning , excellence , engineering , engineering ethics , computer science , artificial intelligence , medical education , pedagogy , psychology , medicine , law , political science , operating system
In this paper, the skills Makers are learning are categorized according to their fit with existing and proposed ABET standards. Makers, both young and adult alike, learn a variety of skills to create technically sophisticated artifacts of personal interest. Here we argue that making (open ended, student led project based learning) and the Maker Mindset can provide a useful template for teaching some ABET applicable skills and attitudes. This paper demonstrates that 3⁄4 of makers are learning how to communicate technical details to a wider audience, 1⁄2 are learning valuable techniques to foster lifelong learning, 1⁄2 are learning how to apply engineering knowledge to solve problems, 1⁄2 are learning specific skills applicable to electrical engineering and manufacturing engineering programs, 1⁄3 are working on multidisciplinary teams, and 1⁄3 are designing systems with realistic constraints. Each of the above categories is part of ABET’s accreditation process for engineering programs. Making offers a potential lens to highlight those areas which may be lagging in a more traditional engineering education. As part of ABET accreditation criteria, universities are asked to demonstrate continuous improvement. For many this means opening maker spaces and bringing project-based learning pedagogies and hands-on laboratory experiences to their undergraduate engineering programs. There is a tension rooted in ABET accreditation standards (current and proposed) for what is expected to be taught in computing and engineering undergraduate programs, how to assess it, and what is valued about the enterprise of engineering education. With recent proposed changes to ABET student learning outcomes, this work can inform and highlight practices for learning outcomes that are otherwise undervalued (those that will be contracted or combined), as well as present alternative approaches to disciplinary knowledge construction and technical competence.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom