z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Exploring Contemporary Issues in Sustainable Energy
Author(s) -
Paul Gan,
Ryan Anderson,
J. J. Spengler,
Carolyn Plumb
Publication year - 2015
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/p.24062
Subject(s) - computer science , energy (signal processing) , architectural engineering , engineering , physics , quantum mechanics
The overall aim of this research is to promote engineering graduate success in complex, interdisciplinary environments relevant to sustainability. In this study, two unique engineering courses were compared in terms of individual student responses to multiple-choice questions before and after in-class online research, in addition to active discussions. The two courses, both focused on “sustainable energy,” were a 90-student 1 year science-core course with primarily non-science majors, and a 33-student 4 year technical elective course with primarily seniorlevel engineering majors. The in-class online research and discussions were structured in a manner to focus on five issues (science/engineering, environmental, social, economic, and political) related to hydraulic fractured oil/gas well stimulation, or “fracking.” This topic was chosen as a contemporary societal issue with significant engineering considerations. Eight (8) multiple-choice questions were aimed at identifying students’ understanding of basic science and engineering concepts, as well as gauging opinions on the practices and policies related to fracking. Following initial questions, students were presented basic fracking science, engineering, impacts and policy information in video format. Students, pre-assembled into equal-sized groups, then conducted individual online research focusing on the specific issue to which their group was assigned. Student scribes were self-identified within the groups to compile and distill information collected during online research, which they subsequently shared in open discussion. Students were then asked identical questions following the discussion, in addition to rating the effectiveness of the class format on their individual learning. In general, students’ basic understanding of fracking improved significantly, their opinions on the topic shifted from neutrality, and the majority agreed that the format was effective in their learning. Additional results from comparing the two courses, as well as examples of student-generated materials are presented and discussed in context of the overall research aim.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom