English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Implementation of writing across the curriculum is intended to improve the communication skills of engineering technology (ET) graduates to better meet the needs of industry, as well as to meet the general education requirements at many institutions. One way to include writing experiences in the ET curriculum is to identify courses already writing intensive and create appropriate assignments to develop improved student writing skills. The “Writing Assignments for Technical Courses” workshop sponsored by the Liberal Education Division at the 2000 ASEE Conference discussed how student peer review can be used with well-designed writing assignments in technical courses. Based on this workshop, writing assignments in a junior level civil engineering technology course have been used to help students improve their writing skills. Writing assignments varied from transmittal memos, technical memos, laboratory reports and a five to seven page research paper on topics that time constraints prevent from being covered in class. To compare the effectiveness of peer reviewed writing assignments with non-peer reviewed assignments; the peer review process was used only for the paper. All other writing assignments were not peer reviewed. Peer review teams of three students were assigned by the instructor based on writing abilities observed during the first half of the semester. In order to expose students to a wider variety of technical information, students were matched so they reviewed papers on topics different from their own paper. Two students reviewed each paper. Assignment grades were based primarily on the final paper but a portion of the grade was related to the review process. A questionnaire obtained student feedback on the writing assignments and peer review process. Recommendations for improvement of peer review writing assignments are presented.

Using The Peer Review Process To Implement Writing Assignments In An Engineering Technology Course