z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Two More Ways To Evaluate Teaching Performance
Author(s) -
Gaile Griffore,
Craig Somerton
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
papers on engineering education repository (american society for engineering education)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--9923
Subject(s) - formative assessment , summative assessment , computer science , session (web analytics) , final examination , mathematics education , psychology , world wide web
The search continues for effective ways to evaluate college teaching. Still, the most prevalent assessment tool is the student evaluation. The authors examined two additional tools to determine whether they might provide administrators with useful supplementary information for formative and summative evaluations. One is a student assessment of their learning using the course learning objectives, while the other looks at the number of students who drop the course. These tools still use students in the assessment process, but one tries to disassociate learning assessment from instructor personality assessment, and the other is based on student action (dropping the course) and not on student opinion. The investigation revealed that the course learning assessment can be a useful tool for evaluating teaching, but the student drop rate is not.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom