z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Evaluating The Benefits Of Hybrid Vehicles Concepts
Author(s) -
Joshua Talbert,
Richard Wilk,
Frank Wicks
Publication year - 2020
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--9236
Subject(s) - automotive engineering , gallon (us) , battery electric vehicle , regenerative brake , battery (electricity) , electric vehicle , zero emission , engine power , engineering , power (physics) , computer science , electrical engineering , physics , brake , quantum mechanics , aerospace engineering
A decade ago it was generally expected that the electric vehicle would represent a clean and practical alternative to gasoline fueled vehicles. The subsequent failure of electric vehicles to be commercialized and used on a significant scale has been a combination of continued improvements of performance and decreased emissions from gasoline vehicles coupled with the fundamental limitations of electric batteries in terms of weight, energy storage capacity and charge and discharge rates. The public’s expectations for electric vehicles has now been replaced by the promise of high mile per gallon hybrid vehicles which are fueled by downsized gasoline engines which is combined with a battery based electric motor/generator. Electric drive will be used at low speeds, engine drive at moderate power requirement conditions and the combination of engine and electric will be used for high power requirement conditions such as acceleration or passing another vehicle while going up a hill. The gasoline engine will also charge the batteries when extra capacity is available and regenerative braking can recover the kinetic energy of the vehicle while braking or the potential energy of the vehicle while descending hills. While the benefits are relatively easy to explain qualitatively, the quantification of the benefits of a such a hybrid system, relative to a conventional or downsized gasoline engine, if it does exist is much harder to quantify. Any engineer should be skeptical of the claimed benefits until understood and demonstrated. Students should be taught the importance of critical thinking coupled with analysis. Accordingly, as a student summer project the authors have tried to critically evaluate the claimed benefits of a hybrid vehicle, along with identifying and evaluating potentially simpler techniques for regenerative braking and for providing extra power for other conditions. Since the analysis of any potential benefits of a hybrid vehicle requires a model of the vehicle that provides the power requirements as a function of the driving conditions along with the ability to simulate a range of realistic driving patterns. A vehicle was instrumented with an accelerometer for on line computer data acquisition and computer to calculate engine and braking power throughout a driving cycle. The results of this test and analysis indicate that the potential fuel conservation benefits of the currently commercialized hybrid vehicles are minimal. An alternative that was evaluated Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright @2001, American Society for Engineering Education to provide comparable benefits with a simpler system would be a downsized engine with a standby engine for high power requirement conditions. A simpler and possibly cost effective method for regenerative braking could use the existing battery and generator with a variable set point on the voltage regulator with the set point increased for regenerative braking conditions. 1. Background Until two centuries ago all assisted land transportation was either by horse or other animal or else by slaves and servants transporting the more affluent. Starting in the early 1800s and then rapidly increasing over the century was rail transport powered by the steam engine. It was only about 1900 that powered personal transportation started with roughly equal portions of electric, steam and internal combustion engines. Nicolas Otto had demonstrated a four stroke per cycle internal combustion engine in 1876 that used a flame tube for ignition and required a gaseous fuel. P ge 670.1 It required another generation of development and major advances including the development of electric spark ignition to replace the flame tube and the development of the carburetor which allows a high energy density liquid fuel in the tank that is vaporized by incoming air and which establishes a workable fuel to air ratio for combustion. THE CAR The advent of the practical internal combustion engine rapidly caused the demise of steam and electric vehicles. Steam engines were heavy, dangerous and took a long time from starting the fires in the boiler until sufficient steam pressure was produced. Electric cars were expensive and batteries limited the range. Ironically, it was the development of the electric starting system for the gasoline engine that eliminated the convenience advantage of the electric car. With an internal combustion engine made practical with electric spark ignition and the carburetor the first decade of the 1900s saw hundreds of motor vehicle companies and models. However, they were generally too expensive for most people until Henry Ford after a decade of development introduced the Model T in 1908. It was standardized for mass production on assembly lines. It remained in production until 1927 when it was replaced by the Ford Model A. Henry Ford had grown up on a Michigan farm where he complained the work never ended and appreciated the liberating value of the machine. Along with being a mechanical and manufacturing genius he was a social engineer who has been credited with establishing the middle class by doubling the pay of his factory workers to $5 per day and sharing half of the company’s profits with the workers. Ford wrote in his book “Moving Forward” that the purpose of the machine is to transfer the heavy toil from the human back. While there were hundreds of startup type car makers and models, the Ford Model T dominated the market for two decades. The cost steadily decreased while the Ford Motor Company’s profits increased due to continued improvements in manufacturing efficiency. What Henry Ford did not anticipate was the transition of a car from a revolutionary new mode of Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright @2001, American Society for Engineering Education transportation to a status symbol. He stayed with his conviction that every car be painted black, because color options would undermine the benefits of mass production. This rigid standardization worked well until the 1920s. The middle class that Henry Ford had created wanted more variety. The introduction of paved highways created a new pleasure in travel. General Motors was first to capitalize on the combination of an increasing prosperity and the status value of a new car by introducing a significantly new model each year. Since then cars were marketed on the basis that prior year models were out of fashion rather than they had worn out. The new model each year also provided opportunities for continued technical improvements that also supported the marketing. Hydraulic and power brakes, power steering, automatic transmissions, ultra long life, efficient and reliable engines, cleaner combustion, internal and external styling, air conditioning and low rolling resistance and long life tires and computer based engine management systems have made today’s automobile far better than Henry Ford or any of the automobile pioneers could have imagined. FUEL The sun is the energy source for humans, animals, steam engines and all of our other hydrocarbon oxidation processes. Some like metabolism are slow, others like fire are fast and others explosive like in an internal combustion engine. The sun is also the source of our photovoltaic, hydro and wind power. However, some forms of solar energy are renewable such photovoltaic and others effectively nonrenewable within the human time scale. With the exception of earth based nuclear reactors, it is the energy released in the form of radiation from the fusion of light atoms like hydrogen into heavier elements like helium in our sun that is the source of all our energy. P ge 670.2 Food and fuels start with solar energy that converts water and carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon based vegetation. Animals enter the food chain and the animal fat stores the hydrocarbons. Thus, horses are powered by the solar energy that has been converted during the year into hay and other forms of vegetation. Wood stores a few decades of solar energy. Decayed vegetation ranging from peat to coal store thousands of years of solar energy. Oils from whales, seals and fish were the liquid fuel sources before crude oil was first extracted from the earth at Oil City, Pennsylvania in 1859. Thus, crude oil from which gasoline is refined represents millions of years of stored solar energy via photosynthesis and the plant and animal food chain. Henry Ford and others in his era realized that petroleum was a nonrenewable fuel and ultimately some form of coal or biomass alternative would be required. However, the amount of petroleum in the earth has been more than earlier predictions. The huge reserves at low and moderate prices has served well in extending the petroleum age. However, the resulting overwhelming dependence on oil for automobiles as well as for trains, ships, airplanes, heating, cooling, agriculture and electric power production results in major economic problems when the Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright @2001, American Society for Engineering Education price increases moderately and may well result in the most dreaded forms of social upheaval when the oil starts to run out. The problem with oil is that it is so much better than any known alternatives that modern life as we know it can not be sustained without it. To a slightly lesser extent the problem with the gasoline fueled internal combustion engine automobile it is too desirable relative to the alternatives. There is a general faith and optimism that by the time that oil runs out the engineers and scientists will have invented some acceptable and hopefully better alternative. There are clearly alternatives, but no engineer or scientist has yet identified any alternative that comes close to the convenience of oil and that will not be muc

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom