Assessment Of Realistic Design Constraints In Engineering Programs
Author(s) -
Enno Koehn
Publication year - 2020
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--6932
Subject(s) - accreditation , curriculum , engineering education , component (thermodynamics) , engineering management , graduation (instrument) , civil engineering software , set (abstract data type) , engineering ethics , engineering , computer science , medical education , psychology , pedagogy , mechanical engineering , medicine , physics , thermodynamics , programming language
The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has adopted a revised set of criteria for accrediting engineering programs. According to the new regulations, departments will be required to demonstrate that various design constraints listed in the professional component section of the criteria are utilized by students in their design sequence. This paper investigates the level, according to construction related students, at which the constraints have been considered in a specific curriculum. In particular, the findings suggest that both undergraduate and graduate students believe that 3 design constraints have been incorporated into the civil engineering program at a high level. These include: engineering codes and standards, manufacturability (constructability), and ethical considerations. In contrast, 3 areas have been rated at a lower level. They include: social ramifications, political factors, and legal issues.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom