z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Use Of Peer Review In The Undergraduate Laboratory
Author(s) -
James A. Newell
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
papers on engineering education repository (american society for engineering education)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--6866
Subject(s) - session (web analytics) , reading (process) , class (philosophy) , computer science , scope (computer science) , value (mathematics) , undergraduate research , mathematics education , multimedia , medical education , world wide web , psychology , artificial intelligence , programming language , medicine , machine learning , political science , law
The value of peer review in developing both critical thinking and student writing skills is welldocumented (1-4). The first drafts tend to be improved because the students’ realize that their peers will be reading their writing (5). Additionally, the student is provided with a formalized to revise the original report in response to the review. The reviewer benefits by being forced to consider the elements that lead to an effective report. However, the instructor must provide sufficient structure and guidance to prevent students from giving entirely negative or hierarchial evaluations (5). Thus, providing a structured report sheet, similar to a referee report, is advantageous.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom