English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The United States is suffering from a national crisis in science and math education. At the middle and high school level, US students perform poorly on standardized tests in comparison to other developed countries. Middle school may be the key to capturing students’ interest in math and science; this is the time when many children decide they are not interested in science, or not good at math. Additionally, most never get the chance to learn about engineering. In this study, eighth grade students participated in an engineering design-based curriculum called Save the Penguins in order to learn about heat transfer. Students worked in groups of four, and were required to test materials, then design, build, and test a device which would keep a penguinshaped ice cube from melting in a test oven. The curriculum, designed by the first author, had been pilot tested in five other middle school classes prior to this study. Three groups of students participated in the current study (N=65), equivalent in terms of their seventh grade standardized test scores on reading and math (p = .600). All students had the same teacher. Students took a 12item multiple choice pretest on heat transfer, and the pretest scores were equivalent for all three groups (p = .763). Students also took an 11-item Likert scale survey of engineering attitudes, and the pretest scores were equivalent for all three groups (p=.111). Group #1 received the engineering design curriculum, but did not receive five demonstrations aimed at promoting conceptual change. These demonstrations relied on discrepant events, student prediction, and discussion, and targeted well-researched alternative conceptions about heat transfer possessed by young adults. Group #2 did not receive the engineering design curriculum; instead they were taught the same concepts about heat transfer by the same teacher, but in the method she typically taught. Group #3 received the full engineering design curriculum in addition to the five demonstrations designed by the researcher. Results indicate that all three classes made statistically significant gains in knowledge about heat transfer and that the two classes involved in engineering design activities made statistically significant gains in engineering attitudes. However, when the three classes were compared, Group #3, the class that received the discrepant event demonstrations, made significant and substantial gains in comprehending heat transfer when compared to Group #1, which received the engineering design activities but not the demonstrations (p = .02). Qualitative data analysis corroborated these findings. This research indicates that engineering design activities while beneficial for promoting attitudes towards engineering and making science learning fun and enjoyable for students, are not sufficient by themselves to promote conceptual change in science understanding. A bridge is needed to connect the design activities with the correct scientific conceptions, and in this study, that bridge has been demonstrated to be a series of well-crafted and research-based demonstrations that allow students to make substantial gains in scientific understanding. P ge 14531.2

Encouraging Conceptual Change In Science Through The Use Of Engineering Design In Middle School