Moving From Pipeline Thinking To Understanding Pathways: Findings From The Academic Pathways Study Of Engineering Undergraduates | Zendy

Cynthia J. Atman | Zendy; Lorraine Fleming | Zendy; Sheri Sheppard | Zendy; Ronald L. Miller | Zendy; Karl Smith | Zendy; Reed Stevens | Zendy; Ruth Streveler | Zendy; Christine Loucks-Jaret | Zendy; Dennis Lund | Zendy

Open Access

Moving From Pipeline Thinking To Understanding Pathways: Findings From The Academic Pathways Study Of Engineering Undergraduates

Author(s) -

Cynthia J. Atman,

Lorraine Fleming,

Sheri Sheppard,

Ronald L. Miller,

Karl Smith,

Reed Stevens,

Ruth Streveler,

Christine Loucks-Jaret,

Dennis Lund

Publication year - 2020

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Conference proceedings

DOI - 10.18260/1-2--3786

Subject(s) - pipeline (software) , engineering ethics , engineering education , process (computing) , work in process , work (physics) , focus (optics) , engineering , computer science , engineering management , mechanical engineering , operations management , physics , optics , operating system

While engineering educators have engaged in many endeavors aimed at advancing engineering education and practice, much of this work has focused on broad curricular issues. Few studies focus on what it means to be an engineer or the process of what it takes to learn to engineer. In the last decade engineering educators have begun to focus on developing the research base with an emphasis on engineering student learning.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research