An Integrated Approach To Grading A Mechanical Engineering Capstone Design Course At The United States Military Academy

Many mechanical engineering departments offer a capstone design course that requires undergraduate students to apply the wide array of theory and skills learned in previous courses. At the United States Military Academy, a key component of the Mechanical Engineering program’s capstone design course, Mechanical System Design, is the requirement for each student team to build and test a prototype of its design. Teamwork and open-ended, real-world problems are vital to this course. However, the faculty has had some difficulty in the past assigning fair, objective grades to students in this course for several reasons. One, capstone designs are more open-ended than traditional courses in which grading can be more standardized and objective. Two, capstone design courses tend to be more decentralized and time-intensive requiring the use of many capstone advisors. As a result, there tends to be a wider deviation among graders. Third, many of the tangible results of the capstone process are presented in briefings and not examinations or papers. Grading oral presentations tends to be more subjective than grading written deliverables. Finally, faculty can encounter difficulty ensuring individual grades reflect the quantity and value of individual work and not just the collective grade of the group. This paper outlines the various steps the mechanical engineering faculty took to provide a more standardized, objective, fair grading process in the capstone course. These steps include use of a non-numeric rubric for grading briefings, graded peer reviews, a more objective rubric for grading written documents, and the use of course directors to standardize the grading process.