z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Exploring Gender Differences in Students’ Sustainability Beliefs in Upper-level Engineering Courses
Author(s) -
Marisa Swift,
Allison Godwin,
Tripp Shealy
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
2018 asee annual conference & exposition proceedings
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--30490
Subject(s) - bachelor , sustainability , engineering education , work (physics) , medical education , psychology , engineering , political science , medicine , engineering management , mechanical engineering , ecology , law , biology
Sustainability has increasingly become a more prevalent topic in engineering as the need for global solutions that holistically improve the environmental, enhance quality of life, and are economically feasible have become more pressing. However, few studies have examined students’ sustainability related career outcome expectations for upper-level engineering students, and, in particular, how these interests can be used to broaden participation in engineering. This time point is a critical one as students will be transitioning from college to industry where they may be positioned to solve pressing societal and environmental problems. To fill this gap, in this paper we answer the question, “What differences exist between men and women’s attitudes about sustainability in upper-level engineering courses?” in order to better understand how sustainability topics may promote women’s interest in and desire to address these needs in their future careers. We used data from a pilot of the CLIMATE survey given to 228 junior and senior civil, environmental, and mechanical engineering students at a large East Cost research institution. We asked the same questions as a previous study, called Sustainability and Gender in Engineering (SaGE), focused on first-year engineering students, “Which of these topics, if any, do you hope to directly address in your career?” with a list of ten sustainability outcome expectations. We used Pearson’s Chi-squared test with Yates’ continuity correction to compare men and women’s answers. We found significant gender differences in students’ desire to address energy, terrorism and war, water supply, food availability, and opportunities for woman and/or minorities in their careers. Some of these differences persist from first-year through upper-level classes, as compared to the results from SaGE in first-year students, while others develop during students’ undergraduate education. Our results begin to help us understand the particular differences that men and women, even far along in their undergraduate engineering careers, may have in their desire to address certain sustainability outcomes in their careers.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom