English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

According to previous research, active learning methods have been stressed several times as being very effective for a better learning experience in engineering classes. However, an efficient transition process to using those methods is equally important to achieve the desired results in colleges that currently use lectures as the primary mode of teaching. The planning process involved in such a transition and its effectiveness was investigated by using the mechanical engineering department in a leading R1 university as case-study, where a departmental policy of promoting active learning methods in undergraduate classes was newly implemented. Professors and teaching assistants instructing mechanical engineering courses in this college were interviewed to understand the steps they went through to transition to using more active methods of teaching. Data collected from instructors-of-record in 5 different sophomore and junior level courses revealed their readiness levels on using interactive methods to enhance student learning. In addition, the immediate challenges that the instructors face due to this shift to active learning has been investigated. Since many of these courses rely heavily on teaching assistants (TAs) to run the active learning components of the courses such as discussion sections, the communication between TAs and their instructors-of-record about the method of conducting these sessions was also studied through the interviews. This work-inprogress provides insights into the differences in levels of receptiveness to active learning instruction methods between the TAs and faculty members. Finally, some information that would have enabled both TAs and instructors to make a smoother shift to active learning practices has been pointed out, which will be useful to other schools planning for a similar shift in their instruction methods in the future.

2018 asee annual conference and exposition proceedings

Board 115: Work in Progress: Retrospective Analysis on the Perspective of Instructors about Transitioning to Using Active-learning Strategies to Teach Mechanical Engineering Classes