z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Board 115: Work in Progress: Retrospective Analysis on the Perspective of Instructors about Transitioning to Using Active-learning Strategies to Teach Mechanical Engineering Classes
Author(s) -
Sreenidhi Krishnamoorthy
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
2018 asee annual conference and exposition proceedings
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--29886
Subject(s) - active learning (machine learning) , process (computing) , perspective (graphical) , work (physics) , computer science , engineering education , work in process , transition (genetics) , mathematics education , engineering , engineering management , psychology , artificial intelligence , mechanical engineering , biochemistry , operations management , chemistry , gene , operating system
According to previous research, active learning methods have been stressed several times as being very effective for a better learning experience in engineering classes. However, an efficient transition process to using those methods is equally important to achieve the desired results in colleges that currently use lectures as the primary mode of teaching. The planning process involved in such a transition and its effectiveness was investigated by using the mechanical engineering department in a leading R1 university as case-study, where a departmental policy of promoting active learning methods in undergraduate classes was newly implemented. Professors and teaching assistants instructing mechanical engineering courses in this college were interviewed to understand the steps they went through to transition to using more active methods of teaching. Data collected from instructors-of-record in 5 different sophomore and junior level courses revealed their readiness levels on using interactive methods to enhance student learning. In addition, the immediate challenges that the instructors face due to this shift to active learning has been investigated. Since many of these courses rely heavily on teaching assistants (TAs) to run the active learning components of the courses such as discussion sections, the communication between TAs and their instructors-of-record about the method of conducting these sessions was also studied through the interviews. This work-inprogress provides insights into the differences in levels of receptiveness to active learning instruction methods between the TAs and faculty members. Finally, some information that would have enabled both TAs and instructors to make a smoother shift to active learning practices has been pointed out, which will be useful to other schools planning for a similar shift in their instruction methods in the future.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom