Adjusting to the New ABET Criteria 3 and 5: It’s Really Not Very Hard | Zendy

Allen Estes | Zendy; Pamalee Brady | Zendy; Peter Laursen | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Adjusting to the New ABET Criteria 3 and 5: It’s Really Not Very Hard

Author(s) -

Allen Estes,

Pamalee Brady,

Peter Laursen

Publication year - 2020

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Conference proceedings

DOI - 10.18260/1-2--29756

Subject(s) - accreditation , flexibility (engineering) , delegation , session (web analytics) , engineering management , curriculum , computer science , software engineering , process management , engineering , operations research , medical education , psychology , management , pedagogy , medicine , world wide web , economics

ABET has revised the criteria 3 (Student Outcomes) and 5 (Curriculum) of the general criteria. These changes have made it through the rigorous approval process and will be effective for the 2019-20 academic year. This paper analyzes the differences between the existing criteria and the proposed changes. Through a specific detailed example, the paper illustrates how an existing assessment system can seamlessly be adjusted for the new criteria. Most of the embedded indicators and direct measures of attainment can still be used. The results simply need to be organized differently.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research