z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Finding Möjligheter: Creativity and Ill-Structured Problems
Author(s) -
Katherine Goodman,
Stephen Frezza
Publication year - 2018
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--28358
Subject(s) - creativity , process (computing) , computer science , rationality , space (punctuation) , flexibility (engineering) , engineering design process , management science , focus (optics) , engineering ethics , psychology , knowledge management , artificial intelligence , engineering , epistemology , social psychology , mathematics , mechanical engineering , philosophy , statistics , physics , optics , operating system
Centered around the concept of Möjligheter, this paper focuses on motivating the rationale for faculty to 1) add more authentic problems to their design courses, 2) foster more interdisciplinary challenges in their courses, or 3) approach design instruction in a more consistent, scholarly or philosophic way. As educators, we often show students how to do individual problems step by step, and find the one right solution but significantly less in helping them to develop the skills and knowledge needed to view a problem from multiple perspectives, understand the relationship of creativity to engineering design and employ these in ill-structured problems. Möjligheter provide a framework for exploring both needs (problems) and benefits (value). In this paper, we argue how engineering faculty should instead, show how creativity can be used in the service of constrained, if ill-structured, projects, requires collaboration, and ultimately allows students to develop better solutions than when we teach design without explicitly addressing creativity.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom