Crossing the line: When does the involvement of human subjects in testing of engineering capstone design projects require oversight by an IRB? | Zendy

Ryan D. Watts | Zendy; Andrew O. Brightman | Zendy

Open Access

Crossing the line: When does the involvement of human subjects in testing of engineering capstone design projects require oversight by an IRB?

Author(s) -

Ryan D. Watts,

Andrew O. Brightman

Publication year - 2018

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Conference proceedings

DOI - 10.18260/1-2--28091

Subject(s) - capstone , sophistication , engineering ethics , relevance (law) , test (biology) , engineering management , institutional review board , medical education , diversity (politics) , capstone course , computer science , engineering , medicine , political science , computer security , sociology , paleontology , social science , surgery , biology , law

Crossing the line: When does the involvement of human subjects in testing of engineering capstone design projects require oversight by an IRB? Ryan D Watts, Purdue University West Lafayette Graduated from Purdue University in 2015 with a BS is Biomedical Engineering and currently pursuing medical training. Dr. Andrew O. Brightman, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Andrew O. Brightman serves as Assistant Head for Academic Affairs and Associate Professor of Engineering Practice in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering. His research background is in cellular biochemistry, tissue engineering, and engineering ethics. He is committed to developing effective pedagogies for ethical reasoning and engineering design.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research