Board # 27 : Developing Integrated Standards for Systematic Civil Engineering Course Design | Zendy

James Morgan | Zendy; Euan Lindsay | Zendy; Pamela Roberts | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Board # 27 : Developing Integrated Standards for Systematic Civil Engineering Course Design

Author(s) -

James Morgan,

Euan Lindsay,

Pamela Roberts

Publication year - 2018

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Conference proceedings

DOI - 10.18260/1-2--27818

Subject(s) - accreditation , graduation (instrument) , curriculum , engineering management , process (computing) , learning standards , engineering education , professional development , engineering , medical education , engineering ethics , computer science , pedagogy , psychology , medicine , mechanical engineering , operating system

Engineering degrees are subject to a range of different quality assurance frameworks, which while often similar in their overall intent, can manifest quite differently. Some have requirements for the structure or content of the program; others have mandated expectations from the graduates. Most university courses are required to meet multiple standards to demonstrate accountability to professional organisations, employers and other governing bodies/government agencies for producing graduates with disciplinary knowledge and skills and generic skills for employability.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research