Matching Team Activities To Learning Objectives: A Theoretical Discussion Of The Role Of Goal Orientation
Author(s) -
Stacee Harmon,
Wendy James,
Richard Bryant
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
2007 annual conference and exposition proceedings
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.18260/1-2--2602
Subject(s) - goal orientation , computer science , matching (statistics) , orientation (vector space) , goal setting , artificial intelligence , human–computer interaction , psychology , management science , knowledge management , social psychology , engineering , mathematics , statistics , geometry
Engineering courses can typically be arranged into one of two categories: content area courses and design courses. While the acquisition of conceptual knowledge is an intrinsic objective of a content area course, this objective is sometimes extrinsic to a design course. Conversely, in design, the intrinsic objectives are usually teamwork skills and development of technical proficiencies. Recently there has been a move toward bringing laboratory-based activities into content area classrooms to enrich learning. The purpose of this paper is to investigate course design in view of student goal orientation and the attributional theory of motivation. In social cognition theory, an individual’s goal orientation is seen to greatly influence his willingness to accept a challenge and to persist when faced with difficulties. The types of team activities employed in a classroom foster either a performance-goal oriented or learning-goal oriented learning environment. In a group project, students divide a large task into individually manageable parts, much like practicing engineers do in industry. This type of activity has an inherent performance goal, the creation of a functional end product. On the other hand, cooperative team projects focus on mastery or learning goals. All of the students on a team work together on a single task, and the students help each other so that everyone seeks understanding of each concept. The conclusion is made that group projects are effective in meeting the learning objectives in design courses due to their inherent performance goal orientation, while cooperative team projects meet the learning objectives in content area courses due to their inclination toward learning goals. Understanding how the design of learning tasks affects students’ goal orientation enables an instructor to match team activities to desired learning outcomes and to create an environment which promotes the desired type of goal orientation.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom